Wie wir am besten das Klima retten

Ich habe, wie viele meiner Berufskollegen (Ingenieure), lange darüber nachgedacht, wie wir das Klima am besten retten können. Ich habe mich mit Maßnahmen der Reduzierung des CO2-Ausstoßes beschäftigt, mit Methoden, das CO2 in der Atmosphäre im Ozean zu speichern oder im Gesteinsuntergrund. Selbst mit weltraumgestützten Methoden zur großflächigen Abschattung der Erdoberfläche, um die Sonneneinstrahlung zu reduzieren, habe ich mich beschäftigt.

Doch nun – HEUREKA! – bin ich auf die Lösung gestoßen. Sie war so trivial, dass ich sie jahrelang übersehen habe, obwohl ich mich auf anderen Gebieten mit Wärmeübertragung beschäftige (wie konnte ich es nur übersehen, ich musst mir wirklich einmal gegen die Stirne klatschen):

Bildschirmfoto 2019-07-30 um 11.37.45

Dies ist das Stefan-Boltzmann-Gesetz. Es beschreibt die Wärmeabstrahlung eines physikalischen Körpers in die Umgebung. Die Erde ist ein physikalischer Körper, also will ich einmal ausrechnen, welche Wärme sie in den umgebenden Raum abstrahlt:

T ist die durchschnittliche Temperatur der Erde von ca. +14°C (statistischer Schätzwert, niemand kennt die durchschnittliche Temperatur der Erde genau!) oder 287 Kelvin (273 Kelvin entspricht 0°C). A ist die Oberfläche der Erde von 510.100.000 km², also rund 510 Millionen Quadratkilometern, oder 510,1 · 10¹² m² (dieser Wert ist genau). σ ist die aus Experimenten sehr genau bestimmte Stefan-Boltzmann-Konstante von 5,67 e-8 W/m2K4 und ε ist der temperaturabhängige Emissionsgrad der Erde, der irgendwo geschätzt zwischen 0,85 (helleres Gestein) bis 0,98 (Maximum für Wasser) liegt (niemand kennt diesen Wert für die gesamte Erde genau). Ich nehme mal den ungefähren Mittelwert von 0,93 an, obwohl das wahrscheinlich zu wenig ist, weil die Erdoberfläche zu zwei Dritteln aus Wasser besteht.

Damit ergibt sich eine Wärmeleistung von P = 0,93 · 5,67 e-8 W/m2K4 · 510,1 · 10¹² m² · (287K)^4 = 1,8e17 W oder 182 Millionen Gigawatt, was der Anzahl von 182 Millionen atomaren oder fossilen Großkraftwerken entspricht, oder pro Tag (86400 Sekunden) einer Energie von 1,6e22 Joule oder 380.000 Wasserstoffbomben von 10 MT Sprengkraft (10 MT hat 4,2e16 J).

Also, das Stefan-Boltzmann-Gesetz erklärt uns, dass die Erde sich pro Tag mit der Wärmeleistung von 380.000 großen Wasserstoffbomben ABKÜHLT (nicht aufheizt). Diese Wärmeenergie wird von der Erde jeden Tag in den Weltraum abgegeben. Selbstverständlich wird gleichzeitig pro Tag dieselbe Wärmemenge auf der sonnenzugewandten Seite der Erde durch das Sonnenlicht zugeführt, was die Erde ja überhaupt in ihrem mittleren Temperaturgleichgewicht von geschätzten +14°C hält. Ja, es ist wahr: die Sonne bombardiert die Erde jeden einzelnen Tag mit der Energie von dreihundertachtzig tausend (!) zehn Megatonnen (!) Wasserstoffbomben, um sie auf vierzehn Grad Celsius zu halten. Die Erde ist halt riesig und der Weltraum ist kalt. – Sie ahnen wahrscheinlich schon, worauf ich hinaus will.

Wenn die Temperatur auf der Erde sich nun durch die Zunahme von CO2 in der Atmosphäre und den prognostizierten resultierenden Treibhauseffekt um 1°C aufheizen würde, also von +14°C auf +15°C Durchschnittstemperatur, dann muss man in die obige Formel 288K statt 287K einsetzen und die Wärmeleistung erhöht sich um den Faktor 288^4/287^4 = 1,014 von 1,8e17 W auf 1,825e17 W, also erhöht sich die Wärmeabfuhrleistung um 0,025e17 oder 2,5e15 W oder 2,5 Millionen Gigawatt. Also nimmt die Wärmeabfuhr der Erde dann mit der Leistung von 2,5 Millionen atomaren Großkraftwerken zu.

Bei einer Temperaturerhöhung um 1°C werden am Tag 2,5e15 W · 86400 s = 2,16e20 Joule (1 Joule = 1 Ws) mehr in den Weltraum abgegeben als vorher, was einer Wärmeenergie von 5142 großen Wasserstoffbomben von 10 Megatonnen Sprengkraft entspricht (1 kT = 4,2e12 J und 1MT = 4,2e15 J) oder der Wärme von 2,5 Millionen Großkraftwerken über den ganzen Tag verteilt.

Umgekehrt gedacht, müsste die Menschheit jeden einzelnen Tag und 365 Tage im Jahr 5142 (!) Wasserstoffbomben von 10 Megatonnen (!) zünden oder alternativ 2,5 Millionen (!) neue atomare Großkraftwerke betreiben, um die Temperatur der Erde im Durchschnitt um etwa 1°C zu erhöhen. Tut sie das nicht wird die Temperatur über das Stefan-Boltzmann-Gesetz in einem niedrigeren natürlichen Gleichgewicht gehalten, was neben vielen starken Faktoren (v.a. Albedo der Erde, Ozeane als Wärmespeicher, Sonnenzyklen, Umlaufbahn der Erde, Wasserdampf in der Atmosphäre, Methangas aus den Permafrostböden) auch ein wenig vom CO2-Gehalt der Atmosphäre bestimmt wird, an dem die Menschheit wiederum einen Anteil von etwa 3 bis 4 Prozent (Schätzungen) leistet.

Wir haben oben in unserem denkbar einfachsten Modell der Erde (Stefan-Boltzmann-Wärmeabstrahlungsgesetz) gesehen, dass für eine Temperaturerhöhung von durchschnittlich 14°C auf durchschnittlich 15°C eine zusätzliche Wärmeleistung von 2,5e15 W notwendig ist. Um die 14°C aufrecht zu erhalten bedarf es 1,8e17 W. Setzen wir beide Leistungen einmal in Relation: 2,5e15 W / 1,8e17 W = 2,5 / 180 = 1/72 < 1,4%. Wir wissen, dass die Strahlungsleistung der Sonne während des elfjährigen Sonnenzyklus um 0,1% schwankt. Das haben wir gemessen. Wir wissen aber überhaupt nicht, wie die Leistung der Sonne im Zeitraum vieler Jahrzehnte oder einiger Jahrhunderte schwankt, weil damals noch nicht gemessen wurde. Daumenschätzungen, die man hier und da liest, reden von einer Zunahme „von ungefähr 0,5% seit dem siebzehnten Jahrhundert“. Sie sind aber nicht belastbar. Trotzdem fließen sie als angebliche Fakten in die vorhandenen Modelle ein. Wenn diese Aussagen aber völlig falsch sind, und die Wahrheit zum Beispiel bei 1,4% läge, was durchaus sein kann, weil es niemand weiß, wäre letzteres die triviale Erklärung für die statistische Zunahme der Durchschnittstemperatur auf der Erde. Verstehen sie? Die Ergebnisse der Modelle sind beliebig, weil die Eingangswerte beliebig sind! Dieses Phänomen haben wir in Wissenschaft und Technik oft und es ist immer wieder schwer den Nutzern den qualitativen Nutzen der Modelle trotz ihrer quantitativen Beliebigkeit verständlich zu machen.

Alle quantitativen Aussagen zur Klimaerwärmung, die Zahlenwerte liefern, basieren grundsätzlich auf diesem nicht vorhandenen Wissen von den längerfristigen Zyklen der Sonne und sind damit per se wissenschaftlich nicht belastbar (‚Bullshitting‘). Das Spielen mit qualitativ richtigen Modellen nach dem „was wäre wenn“-Prinzip und die damit einhergehende Eingabe willkürlicher Eingangsgrößen in diese Modelle ist legitim, muss aber der Öffentlichkeit auch als eine solche Hypothese präsentiert werden und nicht als angebliches Faktum, wie es gerade im breiten Stil als wahrhaft populäre Modewelle getan wird und von der Politik rücksichtslos missbraucht wird (zum Beispiel um Marktmanipulationen oder Steuererhöhungen zu rechtfertigen). Eine ganze Generation, voran die gute Greta Thunberg, wird gerade von denen, die es besser wissen, heimtückisch betrogen. Die jungen Menschen glauben, sie kämpften für ihre Zukunft und unterstützen dabei unwissentlich nur ihre Unterdrücker, die sich in konfuzianischer Weisheit vor soviel Anstand lächelnd tief verbeugen.

Alle vorigen Rechenbeispiele verdeutlichen mit ihren riesigen Zahlen an freigesetzter Wärmeenergie die Kleinheit unserer Macht. Zu glauben, der Mensch könne die planetaren Wärme-Mechanismen der Erde in irgendeiner Richtung und durch irgendeine Art technisch beeinflussen ist nichts als Hybris und zwar von der ganz dummen Art.

Andererseits: Sollte der Treibhauseffekt der Erde durch die Zunahme von CO2 in der Atmosphäre den Planeten um 1°C aufheizen, kämpft die Natur gegen eine weitere Wärmezunahme mit einer Leistung – sehen wir oben noch einmal nach – von 2,5 Millionen Großkraftwerken, oder äquivalent pro Tag über 5000 Explosionen von zehn Megatonnen Wasserstoffbomben dagegen an.

Resümee: Das Ergebnis dieser simplen Rechnung zeigt, dass wir das Klima am besten retten, indem wir nichts tun und diese Aufgabe der Natur überlassen. Verglichen mit den millionenfach größeren Gegenmaßnahmen gegen die Erwärmung der Erde, die Mutter Natur mit der Wärmeabstrahlung nach dem Stefan-Boltzmann-Gesetz zur Verfügung stellt, haben wir nichts aufzubieten. Zu glauben, wir könnten mit irgendwelchen technischen Gegenmaßnahmen einen messbaren Beitrag gegen eine Erwärmung der Erde leisten und damit das ‚Klima retten‘, ist bemitleidenswert dumm. Denn das planetare Klima erschafft und ‚rettet‘ sich mit titanischer Macht ganz von alleine und wir Menschen sind winzig und nichts.

Wer es nicht glaubt der rechne es selber nach oder schweige für immer. Für mich ist die sogenannte Klimadiskussion damit endgültig beendet. Ich werde meine Zeit nicht mehr mit dieser bemitleidenswerten massenpsychologischen Paranoia verschwenden. Selbstverständlich geht unser Planet durch verschiedene Phasen der Erwärmung und Abkühlung, nur haben wir Menschen aus einfachen physikalischen Gründen, die jeder Mensch (der des Rechnens mit Zehnerpotenzen mächtig ist), mit Bleistift und Papier in einer halben Stunde für sich nachrechnen und vollkommen einsehen und verstehen kann, keinerlei Beitrag daran. Eine messbare Erwärmung der Erde durch anthropogene Quellen ist aufgrund der Kleinheit der menschlichen Stoff- und Energiebeiträge im Vergleich zu den planetaren schlicht und einfach physikalisch unmöglich. Wir wissen nichts über die langfristigen Zyklen der Sonne, die vor allen anderen Faktoren das Klima auf der Erde beeinflussen. Damit ist jedes Klimamodell quantitativ, also was die Ergebniszahlen betrifft, von vornherein völlig aussagelos (nicht jedoch qualitativ, die Güte des Modells betreffend, mit dem man spielen kann, indem man beliebige Eingangswerte einsetzt und sieht was passiert). Wir kennen die Schwankungen der Sonne (außer dem schnellen 11 Jahres Zyklus) einfach nicht, doch diese Schwankungen unseres Heimatsterns sind die allerwichtigste Einflussgröße auf das Klima der Erde und sicherlich nicht die winzige Menschheit! Der Glaube (mehr ist es nicht), der Mensch spiele hier eine Rolle, ist ausgemachter Unsinn und absolut größenwahnsinnig. Ich muss wirklich lachen, das ich früher so einen Blödsinn einmal glauben konnte. Und ich wende mich von nun an wieder wirklich wichtigen Dingen zu, wie Demokratie, Ökonomie und der Besiedelung des Sonnensystems und der fernen Sterne.

 

 

 

 

Where are the aliens?

– Explanations for the Fermi Paradox

In my former article „On the Drake equation“ I have shown a way how to reduce the number of 4 completely unknown Variables in the Drake equation to only one by application of a model of an interstellar ecology. The Drake equation was introduced in 1961 and provides a simple model for the estimation of the number of intelligent communicative civilizations in our home galaxy. It is related to the Fermi paradox. The Fermi paradox is the contradiction between the lack of evidence for the existence of extraterrestrial civilizations and the estimates that lead regularly to very high probabilities for existence. Famous physicist Enrico Fermi (1901-1954) once produced the following arguments:

Nursery_of_New_Stars_-_GPN-2000-000972

There are billions of stars in the galaxy that are similar to the sun and many of these stars are millions of years older than the solar system. Some of these stars have Earth-like planets and if Earth is no exceptional case but a typical planet some of these stars may also have developed intelligent life. Some of these civilizations may have developed interstellar travel. Even at slow propagation speed our galaxy could be completely traversed in some million years. Since the galaxy exists for billions of years, it should be colonized meanwhile several thousand times, but at least one time.

The latest astronomical research has confirmed some of Fermi’s predictions: In 1995 mankind discovered the first extrasolar planet and since then we have detected thousands of extrasolar planets. We have also detected planet candidates that seem to be within a certain distance to their home stars so that liquid water should exist on their surface. They should be Earth-like. We have detected enough of Earth-like worlds to get into statistic number ranges, where extrapolations normally are quite good (significant). Meanwhile we can predict with a high certainty that our galaxy owns at least millions of planets with conditions that allow organic life as we know it. And again: some of these stars may have developed intelligence, some of the civilizations may have started interstellar travel and our galaxy should be completely traversed at least by one of them.

Actually, if there are so many worlds with conditions that are similar to planet Earth, there should be an agile traffic between all that planets. Aliens should regularly visit us, one might expect. Why don’t they? Where are they? Do they actually exist? At least these alien civilizations should be capable to send radio signals into the surrounding universe, as we do. We are searching for that alien radio signals since decades now but never found anything. Why is space void if there are so many planets with possible life conditions?

First I will present old and partially outdated explanations for the Fermi Paradox. I will also present some crazy ‚Explanations of madness‘. Then I will discuss some new explanations. All different arguments try to explain: why don’t we find aliens?

Old explanations for the Fermi paradox

1- Extraterrestrial life does not exist

This is a fundamental anthropocentric and mostly religious motivated world view. The people who think so, argument either with religion or else with statistics. The non-religious anthropocentric people arguing the little probability. They say that such chemical reactions and evolutionary coincidences could not happen on other planets than Earth anymore. When they are ready with their argumentation they usually get a summarized probability number that is near zero.

The problem with such an argumentation is: the Drake equation (see my former article „On the Drake equation„) will – with such a low probabilities approach – usually give a result that is lower than N = 1 and this is non-sense. N is the number of intelligent, radio transmitting species. And it is quite evident that there is at least one such species in the galaxy: we, ourself, mankind. It then becomes quite arbitrary to manipulate the Drake equation to get the correct result of N = 1.

If we use the simplest model of intelligent life in the galaxy, as the Drake equation provides, it becomes clear very soon, that the argument ‚1 – Extraterrestrial life does not exist‘ leads with a simple mathematical model immediately to ‚We do not exist‘. So it is wrong. Since the Drake equation was presented, the argument that the probability of life is to low is not valid anymore and therefor it is outdated.

2 – Extraterrestrial life is too rare

Here science starts. When you play with the Drake equation you can get scenarios where the number of intelligent radio signal emitting species is higher than one but still small. Drake himself estimates the number currently at a value of maximum 10,000. Please have in mind that the galaxy has around 200,000,000,000 stars (200 billion stars). This means civilizations in the galaxy are rare (one of 20 million star systems is inhabited) and therefor the probability to ever receive signals from them or detect their space ships is very low.

For comparison: In the clearest nights in a dessert we can see with our eyes a maximum of 3000 stars. The European Southern Observatory (ESO) in Chile can detect 80 million stars with its 4 interconnected huge 8.2m mirror telescopes. If Drake’s estimation of 10,000 or one of 20 million was correct, they could ’see‘ four stars where aliens live, but which 4 exactly of 80,000,000?

2a – Every civilisation has to go through a bottleneck

This is actually a variation of ‚2 – Extraterrestrial life is too rare‘. Mostly it is assumed that civilizations are sparely distributed because of natural disasters (see ’10 -Intelligent life is destroyed by natural disasters‘) or because of self destruction (see ’11 – Intelligent life destroys itself after a while‘). Some people speak about the ‚bottleneck‘ civilizations have to undergo. Of course this bottleneck explanation is a tautology, because it anticipates it’s own result that civilizations are rare, that we actually don’t know.

2b – Civilizations are too far apart in space and time

This is an alternative description of ‚2 – Extraterrestrial life is too rare‘, because if intelligent species are rare they should also be in average very far away from each other. They could also miss each other in time. When one exists the other civilization is yet not born or already has extinguished.

An example how we could regularly miss each other: A civilization may have started sending radio signals 100 thousand years ago, but is located 150 thousand light years away from Earth. Therefor we had to wait another 50 thousand years to receive their signal. They might be extinct for 90 thousand years now, maybe because of a nuclear war. 20 thousand years in the future an asteroid hits Earth heavily that civilization on Earth is setback for 60 thousand years. We will never receive the first incoming signals of our neighbors in the year 50 thousand and also never witness their extinction, because when we start readopting radio communication again in the year 80 thousand, our neighbors are already extinct for 170 thousand years and their last signals passed earth 20 thousand years ago int the year 60 thousand. We would never know about them and they of course would never know about us. There might have been many radio signals in the history of man, that passed Earth without the possibilities of listening.

2c – Humans have not existed long enough

This is actually a variation of ‚2b – Civilizations are too far apart in space and time‘. It means that if we only exist long enough and still wait for the signals, we once will get signals from one of the rare civilizations, because the probability is increasing with the time we are searching.

For example such an civilization may have started sending radio signal 100 thousand years ago, but is 150 thousand light years away. Therefor we have to wait until the year 50 thousand to receive their signal.

3 – We are accidentally the first intelligent life in our galaxy

It may be possible that life has started on earth for the first time. Or it may be possible that even if life is common in the galaxy, intelligence is not. Earth for example owns higher life forms like plants and land animals for about 500 million years. But intelligent life has just started with the genus Homo sapiens ca. 100,000 years ago. So during the period of complex life on Earth only 0.02% of the time was intelligent life. It simply could be that we are listening to worlds that are still stuck within the 99,98% of the period of complex life without intelligent life forms.

This argument only says that we are the first one in our galaxy, not in the whole universe and that this happened accidentally. So don’t mix this argument with the anthropic principle (see ’18 – The anthropic principle let us be the first intelligence in the universe‘).

3a – We are accidentally the first intelligent life with technology

This is just a variation of ‚3 – We are accidentally the first intelligent life in our galaxy‘. For example mankind has developed radio communication for ca. 100 years now but intelligent life on Earth has started with the genus Homo sapiens about 100,000 years ago. This means telecommunication technology exists only 0.01% of the time since intelligent life exists. Maybe the aliens are still stuck in the 99,99% without radio transmitters.

This argument only says that we are the first one in our galaxy, not in the whole universe and that this happened accidentally. So don’t mix this argument with the anthropic principle (see ’18 – The anthropic principle let us be the first intelligence in the universe‘).

4 – It’s too difficult to detect radio signals

One of the most probable explanation for the Fermi Paradox is that we are not listening properly. This argument is not to blame the SETI (search for extra terrestrial intelligence) program. It is to indicate how difficult the task actually is. For example we might not have the knowledge or even the mathematical theory to detect highly sophisticated modulated signals within the received radio signals.

4a – We have not the gear to detect the signals

Signals that are broadband and emitted spherically are much to weak for deep space receiving. E.g. Earths television and radio broadcasting would only be detectable up to 0.3 light-years with the biggest telescope on Earth (Arecibo Observatory). That is less than 1/10 of the distance to the nearest star. So if we wanted to hear normal civilian telecommunication transmission of another extrasolar planet we would need antennas as big as small moons. This is science fiction. Maybe in thousand years we might install such a antenna in a far orbit of Jupiter.

4b – We have not the resources to detect the radio signals

SETI has to fight with limited resources, therefor they can only concentrate to good candidates in the sky and to certain frequencies. Even if SETI had 1000 times more funding it could still only listen to a small fraction of possible candidates (our galaxy has 200 billion stars). The candidates are mostly main-sequence stars that are sunlike, because it is assumed the probability is the highest there.

A deep space signal is much easier to detect if the signal energy is limited to either a narrow band (range of frequencies), or directed at a specific part of the sky. Our space probes use both techniques to send their data back to earth: they use bands as narrow as possible and direct a bundled radio signal beam into Earths direction.

We assume that civilizations who do deep space radio communication will do the same as we do with our space probes: using small bands and directed beams to prevent that monstrous antennas of moon-size I mentioned before. If this is the case – and probably it is – we had to be very lucky, if we would be accidentally at the right time within such a narrow radio beam. And there is still the problem of which small frequency band to listen too.

Our instruments maybe just not sensitive enough, our antennas may be still too small, we don’t know about frequency, modulation, data rates. It is altogether to much variables that we only can guess.

Even if there are thousands of civilizations in our galactic vicinity, the chance to detect their deep space radio transmissions they send to their own starships or to their colonies is nearly zero. We had to be very, very lucky to find some signals accidentally: This would mean to get into the small radio signal cone for some hours and listening to the right frequencies with the right signal data processing methods at that time.

4c – Even if aliens are contacting us chances are low

Only if the aliens know about our existence and intentionally want to get attention we had a little chance: then they would bundle their signals on our sun and send permanently on a small frequency band that is easy to detect and decipher. We only had to listen on all radio bands for any object in the night sky that is within the range of our antennas, where they are still able to isolate signals from noise. But this is also dependent from the size of the sender. SETI is exactly following this assumptions. For other more resource intensive methods they – not nearly – don’t have the funding.

If the aliens would know about us and wanted us to recognize them by all means, the chances for receiving their signals were still small. This is because SETI has not enough antennas, computers and personnel. It’s a needle in the haystack problem where you even don’t know if the needle exists. They might need hundreds of years to receive this single intentional signal in the sky or will never find it because it’s not there.

5 – They are using Neutrinos for communication

It was proposed, alien civilizations could use neutrinos for communication. Mankind is building up neutrino detectors for some years now. There are underwater detectors like ANTARES, NESTOR, KM3NeT or Baikal Deep Underwater Neutrino Telescope; there is an under-ice neutrino detector called IceCube; and there are some underground neutrino observatories like CUORE, MINOS or Kamioka Observatory. They are all used for astronomy research to detect neutrinos from cosmic objects. Maybe we are lucky to receive patterns of artificial or intelligent origin within the signals.

5a – They are using quantum entanglement for communication

Around the year 2008 there were some reports in the media about communication experiments at the university of Genf with data transmission speed higher than light speed. They used entangled quantum states and measured this spooky action over 18km distance and 24 hours. They came to the result that this communication was at least 10,000 faster as light. This experiments could not be confirmed by other physicists. It was probably measurement errors. Because 18km is not that far when we talk about light speed and even 10,000 times light speed. Therefor this possible option is not valid anymore and therefor outdated.

6 – No one is transmitting because of cost

Transmitting signals to unknown civilizations far away from your own home star is more complex and more expensive than receiving them. Structures of the size of small moons (magnitude of 100 km) could be needed. At least if you want to make sure, that you are seen on normal radio frequencies in the distance of tens of thousands of lightyears with medium sized antennas of 100m diameter magnitude.

There is the possibility that no civilization in the galaxy owns such huge devices, because they are much to resource intensiv and actually not needed for interstellar travel. When a civilization executes interstellar travel they always know the position and distance of their targets, the starships and the colonies, and so do they. And they are not so far away: typically in the range of 10 light years magnitude because of simple physical reasons.

It could be possible that no civilization in the galaxy will afford such giant antennas that are needed to contact distant civilizations 10.000 light years away.

6a – No one is transmitting because of the Fermi paradox

I assume that other civilizations who are currently listening for signals in the galaxy experience the same contradiction: they know there should be thousands or even millions of civilizations but they receive nothing.

Therefor it actually makes no sense for them to build those giant structures in the size of a small moon, even if they could. And as long no one has started to build these huge senders, the chances to receive accidentally any other small band alien signal are practically zero.

This would mean no civilization would ever build these giant transmitters. The Fermi paradox would last forever because of itself.

6b – It’s too dangerous to transmit

Some militaries warned governments not to transmit deep space signals out into the galaxy. And they are actually right to be careful. Signals could attract enemies like pirates oppressors or even something like galactic colonial powers. We could easily loose our freedom or even our life (see ’12 – Intelligent life destroys others by nature‘).

We don’t know so much about deep space, maybe other civilizations know more than we and therefor decided not to transmit signals. We don’t know about any other civilization. We don’t know about their history. We don’t know about their mentality. We don’t know about their weapons. They could come to steel our resources using military forces. Could our nuclear weapons stop them? What if they would also use nuclear weapons and would not care about the complete destruction of Earths biosphere? We only have our Earth, they might have several worlds. Maybe they had other priorities than preserve nature, e.g. mining mineral oil, rare-earths and uranium?

6c – Everyone is afraid of transmitting

But even if there are no enemy civilizations at all out in the galaxy. Do we know? Do we have a proof? The alien strategists could think the same as our militaries do, that signals could attract enemies like pirates oppressors or even something like galactic colonial powers. That they could easily loose their freedom or even their life, because of transmitting radio signals into deep space.

Other civilizations might always come to the same result as we did: it’s better not to transmit. This might sound like paranoia but we can also call it prudence. Therefor I think ‚6c – Everyone is afraid of transmitting‘ is a very realistic scenario.

7 – Earth is deliberately preserved

This is sometimes called the ‚zoo hypothesis‘ and means that extraterrestrial civilizations could decide not to contact us, to allow our natural evolution and development. This could be a law or a imperative for higher developed civilizations. They might wait until we are developed far enough and then contact us.

Some people believe, they are also observing Earth. This has nothing to do with the UFO conspiracy theory. It could mean for example that they visit us regularly, let’s guess every 5000 years (2500 years per flight in both directions is fast when we talk about interstellar distances). Maybe the last forty times they visited us we were not developed enough for them, next time we could be. Next time could be tomorrow or in 4500 years. 500 years ago the telescope was not yet invented, no one would have recognized them, even if their engines would have produced the brightest plasma trails over the sky.

If someone states that alien explorers visited us regularly in history to assess us like patrons do, and he doesn’t do this as fanatic as von Däniken in his popular books, I normally agree. The probability for such assessments is high – because of the Fermi paradox.

8 – They are too alien

Alien life might differ completely from that on Earth. They could be like octopuses or like dolphins. Intelligent – yes, but not building a civilization. Or they could be made of inorganic matter or of liquid or of gas. Stanislaw Lem proposed an intelligent ocean in his famous bool ‚Solaris‘. But we are actually talking about intelligent species that build civilizations, space ships and radio communication. Some kind of extraterrestrial Dolphins or intelligent liquids are therefor not interesting for us at the moment.

Carl Sagan speculated once aliens might think and process data a magnitude slower or faster than we. This would mean that we might not find their signals because for us they would look just like random background noise. Today we know a lot more about compression algorithms and faster-than-realtime simulations than it was known at Sagans time. I think we would identify signals that are too fast or too slow for our mind with our data procession algorithms. I would say this argument (wrong speed of data processing) is actually outdated and not valid anymore.

Some crazy man are thinking about so called ’singularity‘ of a society and ‚uploads‘ from minds into machines that would make advanced civilizations so different from us. Find my thoughts about this in the chapter ‚Explanation of madness‘. For me this was only a strange zeitgeist of the nineties that is outdated and not valid anymore.

9 – Interstellar travel is economically impossible

Some people think that resources for interstellar travel would not be affordable. Space ships always have to be huge, because they cannot get faster than a small fraction of light speed. This is because of the thermal equilibrium it has to stay in and the second law of thermodynamics. A spaceship that would accelerate much faster than e.g. reaching 1% light speed in a time span of 100 years would become so hot that it would actually melt after a short while. And there’s no chance to cool it in the vacuum of outer space. Any attempt of cooling with radiators or propellant would make the ship even slower. Most engineers forget this fact when they are talking about ideas like ‚Project Daedalus‘ or ‚Project Longshot‘. If you are capable of reading german language please see all details in my article „Methoden zur Überwindung stellarer Distanzen„.

Interstellar spaceships will always need centuries up to millennia to reach their destination. Therefor interstellar spaceships have to be generation ships and will be huge. This means they will weight tens of thousands of tons and will ‚burn‘ tens of thousands of Deuterium for their fusion energy propulsion. Any other realistic propulsion has not the power (the energy density) to reach ultra-high velocities in the magnitude of 1% light speed.

An infrastructure for building the spaceships in space out of tens of thousands of concrete and steel and for producing of tens of thousands of enriched Deuterium means to have a solar system infrastructure that is capable of using asteroids and comets as mines and is able to deliver huge amounts of cheap nuclear energy at any corner of the solar system at any time. How this is done I have shown in my former articles „Why mankind must not fear the pure fusion bomb„, „Flying platforms with nuclear pulse propulsion“ and „The Nomad fusion reactor„.

This articles show you the realistic and relatively ’simple and cheap‘ to achieve infrastructure that is necessary for building starships. With such a relatively simple and cheap nuclear fusion bomb based infrastructure, that we could build up immediately with our current technology, it is not ‚impossible‘ to build starships – either technically or economically. Therefor this argument is outdated and not valid anymore.

10 – Intelligent life is destroyed by natural disasters

Any civilization might be destroyed after a while by:

  • Impacts of asteroids and comets
  • Eruptions or radiation instabilities of it’s home star
  • Supernovas in it’s vicinity
  • Volcanic eruptions
  • Natural climate change (ice age)
  • Epidemics

There might be enough possibilities that any civilization is periodically destroyed before it can start interstellar space travel and interstellar communication. One could say this will finally happen to every civilization and is only a question of time.

Some people say the destruction of a civilization by natural events can only happen as long it is not multi-planetary and therefor this period of an endangered mono-planetary civilization is a bottleneck every civilization has to pass. This leads to argument ‚2a – Every civilisation has to go through a bottleneck‘. For the explanation of the Fermi paradxs this bottleneck explanation is a tautology, because it anticipates it’s own result that civilizations are rare, what we actually don’t know.

11 – Intelligent life destroys itself after a while

Any civilization might destroy itself by:

  • War
  • Environmental damage
  • Resource depletion
  • Self induced climate change
  • Artificial intelligence

If this would be an universal law, it would only be a question of time until we would vanish and the Fermi-Paradox was solved quite easily.

Some people believe the destruction of a civilization by itself can only happen as long it is not multi-planetary and therefor this period of an endangered mono-planetary civilization is a bottleneck every civilization has to pass. This leads to argument ‚2a – Every civilisation has to go through a bottleneck‘. For the explanation of the Fermi paradox this bottleneck explanation is a tautology, because it anticipates it’s own result that civilizations are rare, what we actually don’t know.

12 – Intelligent life destroys others by nature

A very brutal hypothesis is that intelligent species who are able to do space travel will always destroy other intelligent species. A species might do this out of:

  • Expansionist motives (resources)
  • Paranoia
  • Prudence (preemptive war)
  • Agression
  • Food procurement (alpha predator)
  • Brood care (parasitic life cycle)
  • Rituals

This explanation of the Fermi paradox sounds crazy but when we look into history books, it’s suddenly quite realistic. Some older explanations for the Fermi paradox that are really mad I have collected in the following chapter:

Old explanations of madness

13 – The UFO conspiracy

Some people believe that aliens already visiting Earth regularly and governments are hiding all information about it. All astronomy, satellite telemetry data, space probe pictures, astronauts observations and even amateur astronomy is forced to silence. This suppression of information works quite well on a global international level since decades. Even the nations that are fighting wars against each other, never violate these secret arrangements. A huge secret administration apparatus takes care that all suspicious information, if written, photographed, filmed or recorded is stolen from individual witnesses and that they are threatened or stitched or somehow differently forced to be silent. This administration stops at nothing they say, neither murder.

Yes, there are people who believe in the ‚UFO conspiracy‘. Of course any global conspiracy theory is assumed to be not valid for our further investigation.

14 – Earth is purposely isolated inside a simulation

This is sometimes called the ‚planetarium hypothesis‘ and is a little like the Flat-Earth theory: unscientific. Some people really think, that somewhere beyond a certain distance around the solar system the rest of the universe is only a simulated reality, an optical illusion. Believers think other intelligent beings just want us to accept that we were alone in the universe and therefor created that simulation. As all explanations in this chapter this argument is assumed to be not valid.

15 – Inflation hypothesis of multiverses

A famous cosmologist proposed a multiverse solution to the Fermi paradox. In his multiverse theory young universes exceedingly outnumber older ones by a factor of 10^1037 for every (!) second of age (inflation hypothesis). Therefor there are much to many universes for civilizations and most of these 10^(103710371037*…) universes will be empty or have at maximum one civilization. How can someone seriously use this experimental and probably wrong calculation results for a theory of life? How does someone get the idea that a complete universe (!) could be empty or had only one intelligent civilization? Do you know the word ‚brainfuck‘? Like all explanations in this chapter this argument is assumed not to be valid.

16 – Interstellar transport is done via ‚mind uploading‘

Some people think it could be possible one day to ‚upload‘ human minds into machines. Everyone of intelligence and mental health understands immediately why this can never work: the human mind is no machine and therefor not compatible with a machine. The attempt to upload a mind into a machine would be nothing else than a lobotomy. ‚Something‘ of the person would remain for sure. A very pure and disgusting creature.

Those people who believe in mind-uploading call themself sometime ‚trans-humanists‘. They believe a network of computers could exist, where ‚advanced artificial intelligence‘, that has ‚already‘ left it’s body of ’shabby flesh and blood‘, could live and travel as pure data from transmitter station to transmitter station.

After the upload they would not be interested in ‚primitive biological beings‘ than us and therefor we would not recognize them until we have not performed the ‚upload‘ by ourself. So they would actually isolate themselves from the reality of the universe.

This explanation is actually very materialistic. And it sounds as inhuman like the ideas of a mad Nazi-doctor. I don’t want to discuss such thoughts here. If you are capable of understanding the german language you can read my article: „Unsterblichkeit durch Autogene Zucht„, where I go into details of some ‚trans-humanistic‘ weird ideas and show that nature has already prepared most things they want to achieve – even becoming ‚immortal‘.

17 – Technological societies loose interest on the outside world and isolate themself

The theory reflects the status of our western society before Elon Musk appeared. No one was interested in space travel anymore or in colonizing the Moon or the Mars. It seemed that everyone was only interested in media, computer games, virtual reality and distraction. The radicals of them were talking about ’singularity‘ and ‚mind upload‘. By the way I always sensed these protagonist as abnormal, rather autistic, actually mad.

Such ideas, that civilizations would develop into parallel virtual worlds and isolate themself against the rest of the universe, were part of the zeitgeist of the nineties (think about the pop culture in video games or in movies, e.g. ‚Matrix‘ trilogy). Meanwhile we know this idea is wrong and outdated. A young generation is thinking, discussing and even partially working on the settlement of Mars and Moon again.

18 – The anthropic principle let us be the first intelligence in the universe

The anthropic principle says, it is no coincidence that the universe produces life and humans. Anything seem to be well suited for the development of man and it’s possible successors (mostly machines). There is a principle in the universe that has to create us and we have to create our successors. Universe has created us that we can discover it. This anthropic principle is not falsifiable, actually a narcissistic tautology and completely mad. Therefor its is not valid in this context.

New explanations of Madness

19 – Interstellar travel is done via the fourth dimension

Their might be a fourth dimension. I don’t mean time as a dimension in space-time as it is used in relativity. I really mean a fourth dimension in space. Two teams of physicist (around Mikael Rechtsman, professor at Penn State University and Michael Lohse from the Ludwig-Maximilians University in Germany) have created two separate experiments where they could prove indirectly via the quantum hall effect the existence of a fourth room dimension. We have to wait until additional experiments will confirm the results.

But imagine what would that mean? A fourth dimension could provide shortcuts through the spacetime. Some people call this wormholes. But stop! Because we are three-dimensional beings, we could never use the fourth dimension as a degree of freedom.

Matter is three-dimensional. Life is three-dimensional. Our body is three-dimensional. We are exiled to the islands of three dimensional room.

Did you ever wonder where shape comes from? I mean the shape of a tree, the shape of a mushroom, the shape of a body. It’s not programmed in DNA, hundreds of experiments could proof this. No one knows, where the shape comes from. What is with the shape of lifeless objects like coastlines, waves, mountains, planets? No one knows (don’t mix an explanation with a model, e.g. fractal geometry).

And the soul? Does it exist? For sure. If you don’t feel it, you are either a blunt ignorant, a bedazzled materialist or already dead. Is the soul three- or four-dimensional? Sometimes we have the feeling there could be more than being only here at this place at this time. It’s just a feeling what a lot of people have experienced sometimes during their life and they talk about it and share their – sometimes very scary – stories.

Ok, physicists may have discovered the fourth dimension and sometimes we feel in our soul that there is more than here and now. Therefor let’s assume our soul is actually four-dimensional. As long as we live we recognize the three-dimensional projection of the soul as our mind.

What happens when we die? Can the soul move sidewards in the fourth dimension? Leaving this body by doing just one side-step? Thereby getting in a new three-dimensional host body somewhere in the three-dimensional world, where the new location is possibly tens of thousands of light years away from the old place? The famous french author and pilot Antoine de Saint-Exupéry wrote about this naturally given method of space travel: his beloved ‚Little Prince‘ asked the poisonous snake to bite him, to get rid of his body and travel back to his planet he came from.

What if space travel is actually what some people call reincarnation? Maybe we are searching completely in the wrong three dimensions. The soul could be a symbiotic or parasitic 4D-species that travels through the universe via the fourth dimension. We call the 3D-projection of our soul our mind. Our mind contains our memory. Our memory is connected to time. Time is connected to three-dimensional space and is not constant. Three-dimensional space is connected to time and is also not constant. Only light speed is constant. How is time connected to the fourth dimension? How is three-dimensional space connected to the fourth dimension? What happens with our mind, when our soul moves through the fourth dimension? What happens with our memory? Do we just loose mind and memory? Or is it stored inside this symbiotic (or parasitic) alien life form, we call soul?

I’m proud to state: From all mad theories in the chapter ‚Explanation of madness‘, my new contribution ’19 – Interstellar travel is done via the fourth dimension‘ is the most insane. I hope you still enjoyed it.

Enough for now with the mad ideas, let’s get back to rational thoughts:

New explanations for the Fermi paradox

20 – Interstellar travel is physically impossible

I mention this argument because I didn’t find it so far in the internet. The radiation between the stars and other unknown environmental conditions may make it impossible to travel hundreds or thousands of years through the open void.

The voyager probe has just left suns magnetosphere some years ago and entered interstellar space. It is still working. We don’t know for how long it may work. We know it’s electronic circuits are not too highly integrated. This is the reason, why it was working fine over four decades within and for about 5 years outside the solar system, crossing interstellar space. For safety reasons we could build electronic circuits even less integrated as it is in the 1970 Voyager probes the case. And no one dictates that an interstellar space ship has to have electronic circuits at all. I can imagine a huge space ship that is controlled throughout manually.

We also don’t know exactly what happens to astronauts in deep intergalactic space. But physics let’s us extrapolate that within huge rotating ships with walls made of several meters of concrete they should experience artificial gravity and radiation levels as it is on Earth.

Experts say interstellar space ships need fusion propulsion because this is the only propulsion that has enough energy density for reaching ultra-high velocities in the magnitude of 1% light speed. This is right. Others say we have no fusion propulsion and we might never have it. This is wrong. We already have fusion propulsion: we will accelerate our huge one hundred thousand ton space arcs by hydrogen bombs. These bombs will be specially designed to direct the energy by the laws of quantum electrodynamics to concentrated beams (nozzle-less). This can be done, it is not impossible. President Ronald Reagan ordered such systems as ray guns (Casaba Howitzer) for his SDI in the 1980th. The other modification will be that the hydrogen bombs will not be ignited by conventional plutonium/tritium/chemical detonators but by electric/tritium/chemical ignitors (pure fusion bomb), maybe with the addition of natural uranium. This modification is more difficult but with a very high probability it already exists (with or without the uranium) in the Russian and American arsenals. Therefor we can say: fusion propulsion is possible and needs a maximum of ten years to be developed to a safe and cost efficient engine in the 100 thousand tons thrust range.

I would therefor say the argument ‚Interstellar travel is physically impossible‘ is not valid.

21  – We are accidentally the LAST intelligent life in our galaxy

This argument is only mentioned for completeness. It is the opposite of ‚3 – We are accidentally the first intelligent life in our galaxy‘. But in a non-evolutionary world view, a perception of degeneracy, it could be a valid argument. It also could be valid in a pessimistic world view. Therefor I mention it, even if I don’t think it’s realistic.

22 – Interstellar communication uses gravitational waves

Let me propose to use gravitational wave detectors to detect alien messages. I don’t think they would be able to create massive black hole binaries or core collapse supernovas. This are events, where gravitational wave detectors produce results. But maybe they have found a technology to modulate information on the carrier wave.

This is just an idea and I know it is not very realistic at the moment. I once created a theoretical machine to produce small artificial black holes, see my article „The Shark and the caveman„. I intended the ‚Shark‘ as weapon, as propulsion for space-ships and versatile power-stations. Maybe someone uses such machines also to send signals over gravitational waves.

23 – We are only day flies compared to space fairing species

Let’s suppose the galaxy is actually a highway and there is permanent galactic radio broadcasting. At least every five thousand years an alien spaceship flies through our solar system. At least every one hundred years a loud and clear radio message can be received. Any space fairing species knows that and they wait patiently for the interstellar liner ships and the regular radio announcements. No problem for them, because they reach a very high individual age up to several thousand years. They start a interstellar voyage for example when they are 200 years young and reach the destinations as an mature person of 1700 years. Compared to such space fairing alien species, we humans – who get ca. 90 years old – are only day flies.

Maybe we are just not prepared for interstellar space travel and therefor the space fairing aliens that are – from our point of view – practically immortal, seem to us to be like gods. This would be another, a better explanation for ‚8 – They are too alien‘. They are actually not too alien. They are in many aspects quite similar to us, but they also are, what we call gods – the gods of our ancestors. But we only call them gods because we are weak and ignorant.

For a day fly the ocean seems to be unbreachable – but not for a seagull. The solution is simple: we have to become seagulls. We have to understand interstellar space travel and its requirements. The most important requirements is to become patient and virtually immortal. Nature has prepared a well working and surprisingly easy way for us to become virtually immortal. To become an interstellar Methusalem we even need not any technology at all. We just need patience. If you are capable to read german language you can read my article „Unsterblichkeit durch autogene Zucht“ and you will learn how we can become an interstellar species.

24 – Interstellar travel is a natural phenomenon

Once I was thinking a few months about the different types of interstellar starships that had been proposed over the decades in science fiction stories and scientific papers as well. One of these types was the so called ’seed ship‘. The proposed idea says it is not necessary to transport crews either frozen in deep stasis or in titanic generation ships. Why not just send the frozen embryos and then after landing on a foreign planet grow them in artificial wombs and parenting them by robots? This was the idea behind the seed ships.

I was wondering which of these approaches to interstellar space travel were realistic and which not and wrote an article about methods to conquer interstellar distances in german language, „Methoden zur Überwindung stellarer Distanzen“, which has been downloaded several thousand times over the years and thereby became a standard article for the interested people. In this article I stated that seed ships are very unrealistic for the transport of crews but on the other hand very realistic for the long time preparation of a crew landing by transporting eggs, seed and spores (dauer-stages) of thousands of species of animals and plants. The crew had always instantly accustomed plants and animals available they could eat after landing and had not to starve or get poisoned by foreign fauna and flora.

This let me questioning if such a seed ship for fauna and flora already existed in nature. And yes of course it exists. It is comets that are created by deep impacts of asteroids, when permafrost ground full of dauer-stages is accelerated that fast away that it can leave it’s planet. By natural swing-by at big planets this permafrost comets can even leave their solar system and start an interstellar journey. Both phenomena are confirmed. The next question was: how long can dauer-stages of species survive such a journey and I came to the interesting result: it depends only on the thickness of the surrounding material. Are the species surrounded by several ten meters of ice, then they can survive literally until the end of time, practically billions of years. Statistically they need usually several ten to hundred million years for a typical chaotic trip between stars until they fall on another Earth-like planet and start to grow.

I also found out, that with this mechanism in mind, it becomes clear that planetary closed ecosystems do not exist and ecosystems are actually multistellar. I called this theory ‚Interstellar Ecology‘ and in german language ‚Stellare Ökologie‘. I knew from former studies that ecosystems underly the energy reduction principle. This brought me to the idea, how such ecosystems that exchange life chaotically via comets could reduce it’s overall energy. The overall energy is the summarized energy the interstellar ecosystem needs to produce all it’s life forms on different planets. The solution was simple: make the chaotic transport of life a little more directed. Therefor any interstellar ecosystem has to produce humans. The biological sense in life of a human being is nothing else than interstellar space travel – nothing more, nothing less.

Therefor we could say: we don’t have to wonder where the aliens are, because they are already around us. The fauna and flora we live with is a mixture and blend of life forms who came from different planets from distant stars and creatures who developed on Earth. We, mankind are a blend of creatures who developed on Earth and alien life forms. We are partially aliens in our genes: alien slugs, alien worms, alien bacteria.

Stop wondering ‚Where are the aliens?‘, just look around, look on the plants in your garden, look on the animals all around you, look on your own skin.

The Fermi paradox never existed.

25 – Space fairing species suppress other intelligent species unintentionally

Every interstellar ecologic system tries to produce human-like creatures for the sake of minimizing the overall energy. The natural transport of dauer-stages of higher life forms in permafrost comets is chaotic and very ineffective. A more directed interstellar transport, how clumsy and unreliable it is, is always more efficient than transport by chance. All Earth-like planets within an interstellar ecosystem will simultaneously produce species that can build half-decent space ships.

Any ecosystem produces a dominant species. Zoologists call this creature the apex-predator. We can observe this in any eco-system: the lion in the steppe, the tiger in the jungle, the shark or the killer-wale in the oceans, the polar bear in the arctic, the wolf or the bear in the woods, the crocodile or the hippopotamus in the rivers, the eagle in the sky, etc. For the planet Earth humans are the apex-predator.

Because humans are dominant and occupy all profitable ecologic niches they suppress the development of other intelligent species. They do this mostly unintentionally. The other apes, the dolphins and wales, the dogs, the elephants, the octopuses, only to mention a few, have no chance. Any of these species has by intellect the capability to replace humans, when humans should become distinct. Pierre Boulle’s narration ‚Planet of the Apes‘ presented such a scenario impressively. Just imagine a very intelligent octopus would start to hunt the most delicious fish in our best hunting grounds. What would happen? After a short while he would be part of the fishermen’s dinner.

The same rules should apply for an interstellar ecosystem. It is very realistic to assume that the first interstellar species in an ecosystem will suppress the development of the other intelligent beings. This might be done unintentionally similar as humans suppress dolphins or apes. You only have to imagine the mining of resources. When an space fairing species mines all natural resources like mineral oil, uranium and rare-earth metals, how can another intelligent species on this planet develop to a civilization?

On the other hand: whenever a space traveling species drops out, maybe they have destroyed their civilization themself in a war, there are plenty of new intelligent species on all planets of the interstellar ecosystem that can fill the gap. After a short time one of them is the new apex-predator in the Interstellar Ecology.

Analysis

I will now analyze all explanations for the Fermi paradox we have just learned.

First of all I will give my expertise. As interdisciplinary scientist I think I have quite good understanding of many of the mentioned topics and fields. I’m an engineer, I studied 10 years mechanical engineering, rocket science, satellites, aero-thermodynamics, combustion, numerical simulation, embedded systems and finished my studies with a diploma. I’m also an enthusiastic theorist in the fields of economy, ecology, physics, astronomy, mathematics and philosophy. If you find a better expert for the expertise, please send me his results for comparison. For the expertise all numbers from 0% to 100% are allowed. I choose the values:

  • wrong: 0%
  • unlikely: 10%
  • improbably: 30%
  • maybe: 50%
  • probably: 70%
  • most likely: 90%
  • true: 100%

The plausibility check is a mere weighting. If I had allowed 0% I had eliminated all entries that look not plausible at first glance. I also don’t allow 100% to stay symmetrical. Therefor it has two values:

  • not plausible: 25 %
  • plausible: 75%

The evidence check checks for the evidence in the phenomenological sense and is also a weighting. It has also two values:

  • not evident: 25%
  • evident: 75%

What is evident? Evident is what I recognize with my senses. What I recognize with my eyes, with my ears, what is obvious or what I can find out immediately. Anything what is a theory is not evident. Anything what assumes qualities of the aliens is not evident.

The result is not a classic probability distribution but more weighted points. The more points, the more probable the explanation.

Probability Explanation Expertise% Plausibility% Evidence%
2 1- Extraterrestrial life does not exist 10 unlikely 25 not plausible 75 evident, cannot see them
28 2 – Extraterrestrial life is too rare 50 maybe 75 plausible 75 evident, cannot see them
9 2a – Every civilisation has to go through a bottleneck 50 maybe 75 plausible 25 not evident
28 2b – Civilizations are too far apart in space and time 50 maybe 75 plausible 75 evident, cannot hear them
9 2c – Humans have not existed long enough 50 maybe 75 plausible 25 evident, cannot hear them
2 3 – We are accidentally the first intelligent life in our galaxy 10 unlikely 25 not plausible 75 evident, we are alone
2 3a – We are accidentally the first intelligent life with technology 10 unlikely 25 not plausible 75 evident, we are alone
28 4 – It’s too difficult to detect radio signals 50 maybe 75 plausible 75 evident, just try
39 4a – We have not the gear to detect the signals 70 probably 75 plausible 75 evident, bigger gear always helps
56 4b – We have not the resources to detect the radio signals 100 true 75 plausible 75 evident, who has enough?
56 4c – Even if aliens are contacting us chances are low 100 true 75 plausible 75 evident, because it’s so hard
9 5 – They are using Neutrinos for communication 50 maybe 75 plausible 25 not evident
0 5a – They are using quantum entanglement for communication 0 wrong 25 not plausible 25 not evident
17 6 – No one is transmitting because of cost 90 most likely 75 plausible 25 not evident
9 6a – No one is transmitting because of the Fermi paradox 50 maybe 75 plausible 25 not evident
13 6b – It’s too dangerous to transmit 70 probably 75 plausible 25 not evident
9 6c – Everyone is afraid of transmitting 50 maybe 75 plausible 25 not evident
28 7 – Earth is deliberately preserved 50 maybe 75 plausible 75 evident, no one visits us
9 8 – They are too alien 50 maybe 75 plausible 25 not evident
2 9 – Interstellar travel is economically impossible 10 unlikely 75 plausible 25 not evident
9 10 – Intelligent life is destroyed by natural disasters 50 maybe 75 plausible 25 not evident
9 11 – Intelligent life destroys itself after a while 50 maybe 75 plausible 25 not evident
28 12 – Intelligent life destroys others by nature 50 maybe 75 plausible 75 evident, as we do
0 13 – The UFO conspiracy 0 wrong 25 not plausible 25 not evident
0 14 – Earth is purposely isolated inside a simulation 0 wrong 25 not plausible 25 not evident
1 15 – Inflation hypothesis of multiverses 10 unlikely 25 not plausible 25 not evident
2 16 – Interstellar transport is done via ‚mind uploading‘ 10 unlikely 75 plausible 25 not evident
2 17 – Technological societies loose interest on the outside world and isolate themself 10 unlikely 75 plausible 25 not evident
2 18 – The anthropic principle let us be the first intelligence in the universe 10 unlikely 25 not plausible 75 evident, we are alone
9 19 – Interstellar travel is done via the fourth dimension 50 maybe 75 plausible 25 not evident
1 20 – Interstellar travel is physically impossible 10 unlikely 25 not plausible 25 not evident
2 21  – We are accidentally the LAST intelligent life in our galaxy 10 unlikely 25 not plausible 75 evident, we are alone
9 22 – Interstellar communication uses gravitational waves 50 maybe 75 plausible 25 not evident
51 23 – We are only day flies compared to space fairing species 90 most likely 75 plausible 75 evident, we live short compared to cosmos
13 24 – Interstellar travel is a natural phenomenon 70 probably 75 plausible 25 not evident
39 25 – Space fairing species suppress other intelligent species unintentionally 70 probably 75 plausible 75 evident, like we do

Results

In the result list (below) you can see the best explanations for the Fermi paradox. The main reasons why we don’t find aliens:

  1. too less effort to detect the signals, not enough resources, insufficient material, insufficient research, low chances
  2. we are day-flies against the huge size of the universe, we have to be patient; if we would detect first signals in 250 years from now we were very lucky because it was very fast
  3. most of the species are probably suppressed (or even destroyed) by a few more developed species that (unintentionally) inhibit their development
  4. space is huge and civilizations are rare and far apart in space and time
  5. earth may be deliberately preserved by interstellar patrons

1 is completely understandable; 2 as well; 3 makes me feel a little bit uneasy; 4 is hopefully true because of 3; 5 is ambivalent: either the patrons protect us against the bad guys from 3, or – more probable – the patrons are exactly that species that suppress us unintentionally as we do with the dolphins and apes.

 

Probability Points Explanation
56 4b – We have not the resources to detect the radio signals
56 4c – Even if aliens are contacting us chances are low
51 23 – We are only day flies compared to space fairing species
39 4a – We have not the gear to detect the signals
39 25 – Space fairing species suppress other intelligent species unintentionally
28 2 – Extraterrestrial life is too rare
28 2b – Civilizations are too far apart in space and time
28 4 – It’s too difficult to detect radio signals
28 7 – Earth is deliberately preserved
28 12 – Intelligent life destroys others by nature
17 6 – No one is transmitting because of cost
13 6b – It’s too dangerous to transmit
13 24 – Interstellar travel is a natural phenomenon
9 2a – Every civilisation has to go through a bottleneck
9 2c – Humans have not existed long enough
9 5 – They are using Neutrinos for communication
9 6a – No one is transmitting because of the Fermi paradox
9 6c – Everyone is afraid of transmitting
9 8 – They are too alien
9 10 – Intelligent life is destroyed by natural disasters
9 11 – Intelligent life destroys itself after a while
9 19 – Interstellar travel is done via the fourth dimension
9 22 – Interstellar communication uses gravitational waves
2 1- Extraterrestrial life does not exist
2 3 – We are accidentally the first intelligent life in our galaxy
2 3a – We are accidentally the first intelligent life with technology
2 9 – Interstellar travel is economically impossible
2 16 – Interstellar transport is done via ‚mind uploading‘
2 17 – Technological societies loose interest on the outside world and isolate themself
2 18 – The anthropic principle let us be the first intelligence in the universe
2 21  – We are accidentally the LAST intelligent life in our galaxy
1 15 – Inflation hypothesis of multiverses
1 20 – Interstellar travel is physically impossible
0 5a – They are using quantum entanglement for communication
0 13 – The UFO conspiracy
0 14 – Earth is purposely isolated inside a simulation

’24 – Interstellar travel is a natural phenomenon‘ made it only into to the mid field with only 13 points. This happened because it is obviously not evident. It’s just a theory. If we once would find a comet full of dauer-stages like eggs, spores and seed, this would immediately change. Then the expertise would be 90%, plausibility and evidence 75% each, the overall result 51%. And we could say: 1. to less effort to detect the signals, … 2. we are day-flies and the Fermi paradox never existed …

 

 

On the Drake equation

– Ecology leads to a simplified equation and a solution of the problem

In 1995 mankind discovered the first extrasolar planet and since then we have detected thousands of them. We have also detected planet candidates that seem to be within a certain distance to their home stars so that liquid water should exist on their surface. We have detected enough of those worlds to get into statistic ranges, where extrapolations normally are quite good (significant). Meanwhile we can predict with a high certainty that our galaxy owns at least millions of planets with conditions that allow life as we know it. But where are the aliens?

Nursery_of_New_Stars_-_GPN-2000-000972

Actually, if there are so many worlds with conditions that are similar to planet Earth, there should be an agile traffic between all that planets. Aliens should regularly visit us, one might expect. Why don’t they? Where are they? Do they actually exist? At least these alien civilizations should be capable to send radio signals into the surrounding universe, as we do. We are searching for that alien radio signals since decades now but never found anything. Why is space void if there are so many planets with possible life conditions? We call this discrepancy the Fermi Paradox.

Weiterlesen »

The Climatic Prometheus

Today I found a very interesting map in the WWW, how Earth will look like, when average temperatures rise about 4 degrees Celsius or 7.4 degrees Fahrenheit. Let’s think big (theoretically) for a moment:

In the future cities and agricultural zones will be located in Canada, Alaska, Siberia, West Greenland and West Antarctica. Only a little bit remains in West Africa and West Australia. The arctic passage will be the most important trade route. Todays tropical and temperate zones will change to deserts: South Europe and South America will be deserts, USA, China and India will also be deserts, the Alps and other mountain regions will be ice free. Northern Europe, England and Russia will be the last remains of the historically relevant political and military powers. Raising superpowers like China and India will vanish as fast as they came. Canada will obviously not survive as a nation and will become somehow ‚New America‘.

climate-change-map-HD
(c) by Parag Khanna

For anyone who reads this map it becomes very fast completely clear, why India and China are strengthening their activities in space exploration, nuclear power and antarctic research. It also becomes clear why Russia is currently arming and pile up nuclear weapons as fast as they can. This behavior is very rational from the point of view of such a climatic scenario in some decades.

Weiterlesen »

Wer oder was ist Monstermaschine?

Der Blog ‚Monstermaschine‘ dient zum einen zur Kritik an unüberlegtem, gefährlichem, oft monetär getriebenem Einsatz neuer Technologien, eben an Monstermaschinen. Big Data ist eine Monstermaschine. E-Money ist eine Monstermaschine. Künstliche Intelligenz (KI, engl. AI) ist eine Monstermaschine. Die Abhörung, Beobachtung, das Mitlesen und Data Mining an der Bevölkerung ist Monstermaschine. Die wichtigsten Werkzeuge dazu, das Smartphone (Kamera und Mikrofon bereits eingebaut, omnipräsent) und der E-Reader (ermöglicht personifizierte, detaillierte Persönlichkeitsanalyse) sind Monstermaschinen. All jene Monstermaschinen werden durch gezielte Fehlinformation, bewusst unterlassene Aufklärung und Ausnutzung des Hanges zur Bequemlichkeit und Friedliebigkeit des gewöhnlichen Bürgers ermöglicht. Genau das ist die Monstermaschine: ein menschenverachtendes und – wenn einmal losgelassen – menschenfressendes Ungetüm.

Der Digitalcomputer und seine bereits genannten gefährlichsten gesellschaftlichen Verknüpfungen (Anwendungen) sind die moderne Form der Monstermaschine. Altbekannte Formen der Monstermaschine: zum Beispiel die jahrzehntelange Automation und Robotik in der Produktion, die nun im Ergebnis dazu führen, dass nur noch hochqualifizierte Fachkräfte Arbeit und freie Entfaltung im Leben finden und den politischen Demagogen ihre Schlägerhorden von Arbeitslosen und virtuellen Massenmördern (Gamer) – gleichzeitig ihr zukünftiges Kanonenfutter – in deren ausgebreitete Arme treiben. Gleichzeitig nutzen diese Demagogen die moderne, digitale Monstermaschine, um gezielt Unwahrheiten über sogenannte Tweets, Blogs, Beiträge in sogenannten ’sozialen‘ Medien zu verbreiten und hierbei neue Formen von elektronischer Unterdrückung und Denunziation für die Zukunft anzutesten. Die Monstermaschine spielt dem Bösen zu und ermöglicht seine schnelle Ausbreitung. Das sehen wir und verstehen wir eigentlich und schalten unser Internet und und unsere Smartphones trotzdem – wie paralysiert – nicht auf der Stelle ab.

Weimarer_Klassik

Weiterlesen »

Who are the survivors of the Apollo Moon landings?

This year we have lost two former NASA astronauts who landed on the moon. John Young died in January 2018 and Alan Bean died in May 2018. I just asked myself, who are the survivors of the Apollo moon landings? Her comes the answer:

1. Neil Armstrong, commander of Apollo 11 was the first man to walk on the moon. He landed on the lunar surface on July 20, 1969. On July 21, 1969, 2:56 UTC, he set foot on the moon for the first time and said: „That’s one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind.“ He died August 25, 2012 at the age of 82.
455px-Neil_Armstrong_in_suit

Weiterlesen »

Interstellar Ecology – and the origin of Octopus eggs

Since a few years the idea of an interstellar ecosystem is spreading out all over the planet. By simple logic deduction it becomes clear, that nature will not use all that energy that is necessary to produce life on each single planet. But nature uses the natural interstellar transport mechanisms of comets and asteroids to spread out life. This is a simple ecological demand: all ecologic systems find their state of minimum energy. This blog predicted interstellar comets and asteroids as natural biological transport mechanisms in 2012. Since the discovery of the first interstellar comet in 2017 it is clear to most biologists that interstellar ecosystems indeed might exist.

 

1024px-Octopus_vulgaris_2.jpg
Photo: Albert Kok, Wikimedia

 

Weiterlesen »

KI – das große Missverständnis

In der heutigen Zeit, also in den letzten Monaten und Jahren, geht es mal wieder in den Medien vermehrt um das Thema Künstliche Intelligenz. Das ist jetzt bereits der dritte oder vierte Hype seit ca. 1960 als die Compiler aufkamen und damit die natürliche Sprache mehr oder weniger in der Programmierung von Rechenmaschinen eingeführt wurde. Ich muss sagen, es langweilt schon. Denn es gibt beim Begriff der Künstlichen Intelligenz ein gewisses Missverständnis: es gibt sie nicht.

Ääretuvastuse_näide
Bildquelle: JonMcLoone, Wikipedia

 

Weiterlesen »

Wie weit können Sie sich zurück erinnern?

Manche Menschen behaupten, sie könnten sich an ihre Geburt erinnern. Andere sagen, dies sei unmöglich. Manche Menschen machen die Entwicklung des Bewusstseins an in psychologischen Versuchen messbaren Ereignissen fest und bestimmen ein Alter von zum Beispiel sieben, fünf oder drei Jahren, an das man sich frühestens bewusst zurück erinnern könnte. Andere gehen sogar noch weiter und behaupten, selbst vor der Geburt, im Bauch der Mutter besäße der Mensch bereits Bewusstsein. Ich will in diesem Artikel nicht tiefer auf verschiedene wissenschaftliche Glaubensrichtungen zu diesem Thema eingehen. So etwas führt aus Erfahrung zu nichts, außer vielleicht einigen interessanten Doktorarbeiten oder vielleicht einer neuen Professur an irgend einer Universität. Aber durch Titel oder Positionen kommt die Wissenschaft bekanntlich nicht weiter. Dies ist einer der Gründe, warum ich den Begriff ‚Science-Jazz‘ entwickelte.

Engel_Stiftskirche

Weiterlesen »

Are we living in a dystopian future?

Can it be that history went wrong and we actually live in a dystopian world? Can it be that the evolution of society was once meant to empower people, to give them ultimate freedom and responsibility of their own life and even the life of other people? Didn’t we trust in human mind and reason? Wasn’t it once human logic to help each other. We were building up a humanistic future with endless resources and no economic restrictions at all. This would have been possible with nuclear energy and space travel. We did the first steps on the moon. We once build up a democratic world of educated people, each of them having power to destroy or create a lot of things. Trust and responsibility of each individual because of human reason, logic and love was the basis of our society. Altruism and charity was the main principle of our religions. The love for all human beings, even the weakest and corrupted, was a logical necessity for being able to work together as a team.

cropped-mg_04842.jpg

Then came the computers and the people forgot dreaming of space travel. In the beginning it was just toys for boys. They just preferred to play with this new toy instead of building radios or steam machines. Then it became a trend, a life concept, even a religion. The name of the priests of these new religion were the names of computer science professors at MIT, entrepreneurs at Silicon Valley, and famous physicists speculating about artificial intelligence and immortality. But the people became more and more separated and lonely. They lost contact to others. They even forgot basic social skills like helping each other and being friendly to foreigners.

Meanwhile the computers, controlling automated machines and millions of new robots, killed millions of jobs for workers and produced a new lower, fourth class of people: the out-selected proletarians. Many of us better educated people cried out: „Hurray! Welcome computer age!“, and started immediately – completely uncontrolled and unplanned – to change anything. Some fell in love with their computers and where whispering while touching their screens tenderly: „How nice, my new device!“. And the hard hearted people where even mercilessly stating: „It’s the proletarians own fault if they are not intelligent enough to become a computer operator.“ And all of us bought those new consumer products very excited (some idiots where even sleeping in front of the stores, when a new product was announced for the next day). Consumer products that actually made us more and more addicted, conditioned and weak.

We have lost a lot.

Weiterlesen »

End of Winter

What power art thou
Who from below
Hast made me rise
Unwillingly and slow
From beds of everlasting snow
See’st thou not how stiff
And wondrous old
Far unfit to bear the bitter cold
I can scarcely move
Or draw my breath
I can scarcely move
Or draw my breath
Let me, let me,
Let me freeze again
Let me, let me
Freeze again to death
Let me, let me, let me
Freeze again to death…
Henry Purcell (1659 – 1695), King Arthur

„Mächtige der Welt, fürchtet mich, [denn] wenn ich vor Gott stehe, werde ich eure Sünden anzeigen“

Ich ging im Sommer durch Berlin spazieren und traf ein Kind. Es stand alleine am Straßenrand und sah sich manchmal um. Hatte es seine Eltern verloren?

„Was machst du hier alleine. Wo sind deine Eltern?“, fragte ich.

Es war ein kleiner Junge, etwa acht Jahre alt.

Erst sah er mich sehr mißtrauisch an. Er sah mir in die Augen. Dann lächelte er.

„Meine Mutter ist dort im Laden und kommt gleich wieder!“, antwortete der Junge und zeigte auf einen Spätkauf auf der anderen Straßenseite.

Na ja, ich hatte Zeit. So lange konnte ich noch hier bei ihm warten, bis seine Mutter zurück kam, dachte ich mir.

Er hielt ein Spielzeug in der Hand, mit dem er herum hantierte. Er schien sehr froh damit zu sein. Plötzlich hielt er mir sein Spielzeug entgegen und sagte:

„Da!“

„Was ist das?“, fragte ich.

Prayer_in_Cairo_1865

Weiterlesen »

Weil wir inmitten eines stellaren Ökosystems leben, war und ist außerirdisches Leben immer unter uns

25BC61C100000578-0-The_metal_sphere_found_by_Dr_Wainwright_and_his_colleagues_above-a-4_1424092569745

Nun ist es bewiesen: außerirdisches Leben existiert.

Es handelt sich um die wichtigste Erkenntnis, seit wir uns vor 2 Millionen Jahren aufrichteten, um einen Keil aus Stein in den Händen zu betrachten. Es ist wichtiger als das Feuer, wichtiger als das Rad, wichtiger als die zehn Gebote und die Geburt Christus, wichtiger als der Koran, wichtiger als jeder Mensch und alle Schriften, ob von uns oder für uns. Es ist wichtiger als alles andere.

Wir sind nicht allein. Da, wo ein einzelliges Lebewesen ist, ist ein mehrzelliges nur einen Schritt und ein komplexes Lebewesen mit Augen und Händen nur einen Steinwurf entfernt. Zum Beispiel sind wir Menschen genetisch zu 23% Prozent mit Hefebakterien völlig identisch [1] und die übrigen 77% sind mehr oder weniger verwandt. Neu ist nun, dass in uns auch ein großer Anteil außerirdischen Lebens steckt und das Leben auf der Erde sich ständig, auch jetzt – gerade in diesem Moment – mit außerirdischem Leben vermischt.

Weiterlesen »

Weihnachten! Heute ward uns ein Heiland geboren – oder wie Jesus die Menschheit rettete

Oft frage ich mich, wie es passieren konnte, dass die großen Errungenschaften der Antike, wie die präzisen mechanischen Rechenmaschinen [1], einfache Dampfmaschinen [2], galvanische elektrische Batterien [3], Bibliotheken mit Beständen von hunderttausenden Werken, darunter große Werke über Philosophie, Mathematik, Medizin, Astronomie und der Ingenieurswissenschaften [4], also alles, was unmittelbar zur Industrialisierung hätte führen können, für fast 2000 Jahre einfach verschwand und dann wieder neu erschaffen werden musste? Diese Frage beschäftigt mich seit langem.

Jesus als guter Hirte, frühchristliche Deckenmalerei in der Calixtus-Katakombe in Rom, um 250

Weiterlesen »

EXIT INTERNATIONAL bietet sanfte Selbsttötungsmaschine zum 3D-Druck an

1511812471049
Bildquelle: Exit International

 

Die internationale Organisation EXIT INTERNATIONAL, mit Zweigstellen in den Niederlanden, Grossbritannien, Australien und den Vereinigten Staaten, hat das Konzept einer Selbsttötungsmaschine aus dem 3D-Drucker veröffentlicht, die es allen Menschen auf der Welt ermöglichen soll, autark und möglichst human und würdig aus dem Leben zu treten.

Weiterlesen »

First Contact – alien Laser Beacons detected?

1024px-Hubble_Extreme_Deep_Field_(full_resolution)
Picture: NASA; ESA; G. Illingworth, D. Magee, and P. Oesch, University of California, Santa Cruz; R. Bouwens, Leiden University; and the HUDF09 Team; Wikimedia
Very carefully (it was not released in the mass media so far. Everybody is waiting for verification. So don’t expect too much):
Our generation might be possibly witnessing in these days the discovery of an interstellar communication system between 234 civilizations in our galactic proximity [1].
Astronomers analyzed the light from 2.5 million stars. They found 234 anomalies that could have 5 possible explanations:
  • instrumental and data reduction effects
  • rotational transitions in molecules
  • the Fourier transform of spectral lines
  • rapid pulsations of the stars
  • laser pulses from extra terrestrial intelligences (ETI)
From these 5 possible explanations of the anomalies astronomers could eleminate 3 so far with high probability. The remaining explanations is an error out of the instrument and data reduction or periodic laser pulses as predicted by physicist Ermanno Borra 2012 [2]. If it can be proven, the spike in the FFT (Fast Fourier Transformation, a standard signal analyzing algorithm) does not come out of the measurement system itself, then it has to be artificial laser sources with a very high probability. Next step would be building huge lasers and sending strong pulse signals into the direction of a few of the nearest of the laser sources to proof Borra’s hypothesis and thereby:
to get into conversation..
STOP

Es gibt keinen wirklichen Fortschritt

Die Geschichte wiederholt sich nur

Neulich saß ich in meiner Stammkneipe und jemand setzte sich mit einer Tageszeitung neben mich an den Tresen. Die Wahl zum Bundestag war erst ein paar Tage her. Die neuen Nationalen Sozialisten – ehemals National-Bürgerliche Liberale aus Frankfurt, die sich nach einem internen Putsch und Strategiewechsel innerhalb ihrer Partei besonders den nach der Wende zu kurz gekommenen Ostdeutschen zuwandten und mit nationalsozialistischer Demagogie mit Hilfe der sogenannten sozialen Netzwerke und Smartphones sehr erfolgreich Stimmenfang betrieben hatten, waren gerade in den Bundestag eingezogen. Es war in allen Zeitungen zu lesen und Resignation machte sich breit..

MGB_Roadster_(Hudson)
MG Roadster von 1979, ein aus heutiger Sicht extrem ökologisches Auto

 

Ich trank mein Bier und sinnierte vor mich hin. Ich wollte bloß nicht über Politik reden, nicht einmal daran denken. Meine Gedanken flogen mit mir durch meine Heimatgalaxie. Der Herr am Tresen legte seine Zeitung ab und wandte sich mir zu:

„Was halten Sie von den Wahlergebnissen?“

Weiterlesen »

Theorie der Stellaren Ökologie bewahrheitet sich

6e25f4bb81a680e098c11a4a21c82bf7
Bildquelle: Tony873004/Wikimedia

 

Die Stellare Ökologie, manchmal auch Interstellare Ökologie genannt, geht davon aus, dass der Begriff des ökologischen Systems als geschlossenes planetares System heute nicht mehr haltbar ist und vielmehr auf Gruppen von Sternen mit untereinander dynamisch interagierenden Biosphaeren ihrer Planetensysteme ausgeweitet werden muss. Sie geht von der Annahme aus, dass die Ökosysteme der Sterne nicht nur periodisch biochemische Substanzen austauschen sondern auch höhere Lebensformen in Form von gefrorenen Samen, Sporen und Eiern. Die grundlegenden Mechanismen der Stellaren Ökologie wurden von Peter Müller in den Neunziger und Zweitausender Jahren erkannt. Im Frühjahr 2012 veröffentlichte er die Theorie zum ersten Mal.

Weiterlesen »

How god created the universe

A harmonic method of creation

Let me explain how I understand after the newest physical discoveries, how god is creating life and anything else in the universe. I will show by logical argumentation how easy the creation process in the universe is performed. It is incredibly simple and god and anyone who is extremely powerful (and hopefully permitted) could also do this creation of worlds.

_MG_0056

Weiterlesen »

Switching-off the internet

If you ever have read Huxley, Orwell or Bradbury in your life, then you know like me, why the sales of mechanical type writers today is increasing again. The more people are leaving the internet again, the better are the chances for democracy, freedom and peace. Internet was once a vision that has already failed. The internet has become a deadly trap.

_MG_3067

But how can the internet be switched-off? – I mean globally.

Weiterlesen »

Internet and the self-destruction of men

How our virtual global village is pushing the social stress level to our natural self-destroying mode

When we currently look at our news messages we read nearly every single day about terrorism, about some young men wearing guns or knifes, building bombs or only using trucks and cars to kill as much people as possible.

441px-Four_Horsemen_of_the_Apocalypse_by_Dürer

Is this really terrorism? Terrorism as I know it from former times was defined as political or religious motivated groups of people, fighting for their goals with all means to produce much fear as possible. It is a form of asymmetric warfare, sometimes called „guerrilla warfare“, where non-regular paramilitary is trying to get maximum attention by minimum effort. I know that journalists will not like the next sentence and it is of course introducing philosophical questions about democracy, about free access to information, etc. but it is also the truth and any serious journalist is aware of it: Media and terrorism build together a symbiotic system. Terrorism cannot exist without media.

Weiterlesen »

Important Ideas of this Blog

_MG_0646

Since Monstermaschine started at 23th of April in 2012, it is continuously inspiring leaders, billionaires and visionary of all countries in the world. Monstermaschine is THE think tank of postmodern humanistic ideas. It is spreading out valid ideas against the antihumanistic machine – we have unfortunately established more or less accidentally since the beginning of the digital age. Therefor some of the thinking, you will read in this blog, is quite important for the life of your successors, even if you might not understand, why, at this moment in time. I will try to present some of the most important ideas. Your great-grandchildren will surely understand.

First of all: Rock is an Ocean

You can conduct huge thermodynamic processes on planetary bodies of the solar system (and far beyond), which do not have any mentionable atmosphere and no liquid water at all by using the bedrock as capacity. Similar to the atmosphere and oceans on Earth, that buffer the heat of all thermodynamic processes of power plants and in the end radiates it into space, the bedrock on other planetary bodies can be used.

An anytime buildable explosive fusion power plant, that sets free heat in spherical underground caverns is probably the best candidate to do so. Very well proven technology for this kind of fusion power source exists since 1952. The plant wanders with the time in a big circle, deep below the surface of the celestial body. Like a chain of spheres, one cavern after the other is blown by nuclear explosives. One day, after at least several hundred years, cavern zero is cooled down to environment temperature again and can be reused. The chain of caverns is closing then and the circular process of explosions starts again. This power plant might become – because of it’s simplicity – the most important machine in the next hundred millenia of human history.

The building of huge power plants on other celestial bodies than our Earth was not possible up to now, because of thermodynamic reasons. Each bigger power generator in the gigawatt output range would have meant to carry millions of tons of dump metal sheet radiators with it, only to keep the machine in it’s necessary thermodynamic circular process. With the Nomad Fusion Reactor, that uses bedrock as an ocean, we have now unlimited access to huge amounts of electric power on any celestial body in the solar system and the whole galaxy.

Rock is an ocean – a very simple idea.

Read about this in:

The Nomad Fusion Reactor

Why Mankind must not fear the Pure Fusion Bomb

Second: Speed of Light is not the Limit – but Age of Men

Weiterlesen »

Wir Wanderer

The_Red_Rectangle_around_the_star_HD_44179

Egal, wie wir es drehen und wenden, wir kommen immer wieder zu jener ernüchternden Einsicht: wir Menschen finden keinen Konsens, an Ort und Stelle zu verweilen, uns die Güter gerecht zu teilen, uns wohlwollend und nachsichtig zu tolerieren und akzeptieren.

Immer wieder folgt Krieg auf Krieg und unser Blut fliest in Strömen, düngt den Boden, färbt die Flüsse rot und versinkt in den Meeren.

Nur, wenn wir weiterziehen, herrscht manchmal Frieden, für kurze Zeit. Aber, immer nur, bis die nächsten nachkommen und auch ihren Anteil verlangen.

Nur, wenn wir zu den unendlichen Sternen reisen, und die Knappheit an Platz und Gütern restlos überwinden, ist unser Bruderzwist für immer beigelegt.

Wir sind nicht dafür geschaffen, an Ort und Stelle zu verweilen. Wir sind nicht einmal fähig, zu lange zu pausieren. Nichts auf der Welt bringt uns ab, von unserer ewigen Wanderschaft..

Der Fährmann

Die Gruppe von Lichtgestalten näherte sich mir und mir wurde eiskalt. Ich stand in einem Tal, inmitten einer Landschaft aus pechschwarzen Felsen, abgerundet wie in einem ehemaligen Wildwasser-Flussbett. Sie hangelten sich entlang der runden Felsen empor zu mir. Ich wich zurück. Ich sah ihre Gesichter: kantige Gesichter, runde Gesichter, Hakennasen, römische Gesichter. Sie erreichten mich. Ich fürchtete mich.

613px-dvinfernoferryacrossthestyx_m

 

„Fürchte dich nicht, Fährmann. Zeige uns den Weg durch den ausgetrockneten Styx“, sagten sie.

Weiterlesen »

Mechatronik 1996

Es folgt eine Kurzgeschichte, die ich 1996 geschrieben habe:

„Hallo, hört ihr mich, hier ist Ada. Bitte melden!“,

spreche ich in mein Mikrofon, doch aus meinem Helmlautsprecher tönt nur ein lautes, knisterndes Rauschen. Ein neuer Versuch aber keine Antwort – nichts! Vielleicht ist etwas mit mein Funkgerät nicht in Ordnung, vielleicht ist es im Gefecht kaputt gegangen. Mein rechtes Bein blutet stark. Hoffentlich haben sie nicht unsere unterirdische Zentrale entdeckt. Wenn ich noch an das Christkind, oder den Lieben Gott glauben würde, dann würde ich jetzt beten, das dies nicht geschehen ist.

atlas_frontview_2013

Weiterlesen »

Philosophische Grundlagen der Stellaren Ökologie

Kritik der reinen Vernunft

Kants Kritik der reinen Vernunft wies den reinen Rationalismus einst in seine Grenzen und verwies dabei auf die fundamentale Bedeutung der Absicherung der Erkenntnis durch Beobachtung. Er wollte damit den Wettstreit zwischen kartesianischem Rationalismus und dem reinen Empirismus beenden, indem er einerseits die Bedeutung von Beobachtung hervorhob, andererseits einen Raum für die große Bedeutung der Geisteswissenschaften wie Mathematik, Logik und Sprache ließ, die ja unabhängig vom Versuch existieren.

karl_jaspers_buste
Karl Jaspers

Weiterlesen »

Hey, Zed

Hey, Zed

th

Hey, Zed, where are you goin‘ with that gun of yours?

Anhang:
[.223, .30, .355, .416, .50, .79, .45, 5.56 mm, 5.56 x 45 mm, 7.62, 7.62 mm, 8.58 mm, 9 mm, 9 x 19 mm, 10.6 mm, 11.6 mm, 12.7 mm, 20 mm, ammo, ammonition, Ammoniumnitrat, ammonium nitrate, Atom, atomar, atom, atomic, Bombe, bomb, bombing, bore, caliber, calibre, centrifuge, dirty bomb, Distickstoffoxid, Feststoffrakete, Fluessigrakete, Gewehr, gun, Hybridrakete, hybrid rocket, igniter, Kaliber, Kaliumnitrat, Kernwaffe, Lachgas, liquid rocket, missile, Munition, munitions, Neutronenquelle, neutron source, Nitrozellulose, Nuklearwaffe, nuklear, nuclear, nuke, Phosphorsaeure, Pistole, pistol, Plutonium, Plutonium 238, Polybutadien, potassium nitrate, Pu, Pu 238, Pu-238, Rakete, Raketenantrieb, Raketentriebwerk, Raketenmotor, Raketenstufe, rifle, rocket, rocket propulsion, rocket engine, rocket motor, rocket stage, Salpetersaeure, Schmutzige Bombe, solid rocket, stage, stage separation, Stickstofftetroxid, Stufe, Stufentrennung, TNT, timer, timer igniter, Trinitrotuluol, Uran, Uran 235, Uranisotop 235, U 235, U-235, Angereichertes Uran, uranium, Uranzentrifugen, uranium centrifuge, Waffe, Zentrifugen, Zuender]